Insurance carriers that have greater exposure to large enterprises are more likely to face the brunt of the losses stemming
According to the organisation, the event is expected to withdraw an insured loss range of $540 million to $1.08 billion.
The outage took place on July 19, and was caused by a security organisation called CrowdStrike, which sent out a corrupted software update to its huge number of customers. As per Microsoft, CrowdStrike’s update reportedly
Reinsurance News spoke to Hatzor about the event, to which he explained that carriers exposed more towards larger enterprises are more likely to face losses.
“This is for two main reasons. One, small companies were able to recover fast. It was a very manual recovery, so the amount of employees was a big factor in your ability to recover. If you have 50 employees and 50 computers, this is probably something that you can recover within four hours.”
He continued: “For enterprises, it was a different game. We actively monitor the service delivery of around 6000 tech businesses. It was very obvious to us that cloud-native tech businesses had less of an impact, compared to more legacy companies that are dependent on Windows computers, and a
“So, we have carriers that are very much focusing on SMEs, and they are not going to see a major impact. And that’s something that we see the data can support. But the loss is very significant for the Fortune 500, so carriers that are focusing on this segment may experience much more significant losses.”
Switching attention towards reinsurers, Hatzor explained how the IT outage may impact that particular market.
“The cyber insurance market matured in the last year or so. We started to move from quota share to excess of loss, but still, the majority of programs are quota shares.
Interestingly, Hatzor noted that for excess of loss arrangements in the market, he is not too sure whether the outage is going to hit them, especially for the carriers that are more exposed to SMEs.

0 Comments